Earlier, representatives of the Smolensk Center for Law and Sociology filed a lawsuit: they wanted to challenge
However, the Supreme Court ruled that the law “Onprotection of the population and territory from natural and man-made emergencies ”allows the authorities to introduce mandatory rules of conduct in high alert regimes. A similar obligation is regulated in the law "On the sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population."
If the visitor does not agree to comply with such requirements, the representative of the trade organization, without entering into conflict with the offender, has the right to refuse the visitor in service at the checkout.
The court's decision
Human rights defenders, however, considered that this paragraphviolates the law on the protection of consumer rights, which does not allow the purchase of some goods to be conditional on the mandatory purchase of some others (masks and gloves).
The director of the Smolensk Center for Law and Sociology, a member of the regional Public Chamber Alexey Peshchanitski said that he had already appealed against the refusal of the Supreme Court.
Read also:
The Doomsday glacier turned out to be more dangerous than scientists thought. We tell the main thing
Found the alleged kingdom of the disappeared Hittites. What have archaeologists found?
An enzyme was discovered that reverses cell aging